Видео

Photogrammetry is a more flexible solution, but also more complex. It’s definitely always there as an option, but most users want the simplicity of point and shoot. But in a future where fewer and fewer use computers…

I don’t think that’s a good idea. It won’t hold the oil and apply it slowly, nor will it capture the dust the same way.

@@BrentLeVasseur thanks for the feedback. 6 years later I try to be better 🤘🤷‍♂️

You can always practice it during the stream!

It shouldn't be very dangerous no. The fan might just be noisy, but probably won't do any more harm than that. If it continues, you might wanna swap it out.

@@3DPrintTechDesign Ok thanks :) by the way i have a large fan next to my 3d printer incase of an emergency (i have trauma).

@TheHeadlessMario haha, better be safe than sorry!

Any help is much appreciated, Thank you :)

I love it already! The dang sigma lens isn’t compatible via EF/RF adapter, so it’s wobbly. It I traded it for the canon RF24-105mm, so we should be good to go 🤘

For PLA, it’s often good to print with top open and even front door open. But it shouldn’t be a factor on very short prints unless you preheated. Is this a pre-sliced model? Otherwise it might just be profiles/slocer settings that caused it to get be too hot

No absolutely not. As long as you use PLA for example, you can use really whatever brand. If you use additives like "carbon fiber" or "glow-in-the-dark" it will wear much faster, but you don't have to worry about regular PLA :).

Thanks for the information. ill definitely be saving that $40 with the off brand. any suggestions for an off-brand that's cheap and trustworthy? I also what to get the extruder upgrade that works with the "tough" version of pla makerbot offers if you have any cheaper alternatives for that.

@@torigilley4099 for now, no. But I sometimes use adhesives, depending on material. :)

Leftovers from experiments with materials that didn’t stick well on PEI. 😘

Nope, the X1-series are the same on those components =).

@@3DPrintTechDesign Thanks for the response! So if I buy an X1 Carbon and install a heater to bring the chamber up to 70 degrees, would I get the performance of an X1E? It only makes sense for the protected connection at this point.

@@Fancy3D Oh, I think there are more components, cooling and sensors that help with controling the tempeature and secure the longevity of the components inside the machine, so it's not as simple as just heating an regular X1. If you wanna tinker, and add heating etc... The X1 could be the one for you. Just don't expect the same reliability as the X1E with it's tuned profiles for some materials. Never the less, Pre-heating the chamber does a lot for printing complex materials, no matter the printer :).

The hotends between x1c and x1e are significantly different.

I think you should see my video on the moose 3D scanner, it’s cheaper and basically performs the same. Or, you can wait for the Raptor that I’ve written about (but not yet have a video on) from creality. It’s expensive, but performs 5x its price or something.

@@3DPrintTechDesign Yes I will be trying the Raptor. If it performs that well it is a bargain!

@martiansunrise7168 here’s my thoughts so far; www.antonmansson.com/3d-printing-blog/creality-raptor-3d-scanner-the-only-prosumer-3d-scanner

Hi! I think you would be able to scan a hoof quite well actually. Specially if you only need to underside and not much up on the sides.

Flashprint can be a bit tricky yes. But you are able to run Orca as well if that suits you better :)

That is the standard camera/tripod diameter of "1/4-20 UNC" =)

Yeah, it's more expensive than a standard nozzle, but it also provides better extrusion reliability thanks to the design. And the change process is much easier than an old nozzle design for example, where you heat up, use a wrench and accidently break your wires etc. But yeah, it's a higher running cost for reliability and ease of operation.

Awesome to hear! I hope more Get to explore the 5M!

You can hear it in this video. The first value it tries for the y axis resonates through the table and you hear a loud bassy hum, the second value it tries removes the hum

@@evancoberley2650 I'm ngl I don't hear the difference. Even while mine did the calibration it sounded absolutely the same to me.

@@Mephora if you set it on a stable surface like concrete there won't be much noise to begin with

@@evancoberley2650 it's definitely noisy. It's on a hollow cabinet after all. So I wouldn't call that quiet depending on the frequencies. But as far as I know it's also only supposed to Actively cancel the noise of the motors not the resonance of the surroundings

@@Mephora it listens to how the frequencies of the motors affect the surroundings and reverberate through the table, because those reverberations go back into the printer and require input shaping to dampen

I wouldnt say that! Its actually quite some scanner for the money. But it’s not a high-end scanner and you don’t get perfect results in real life scanning. Still incredible cheap for what many users need; reference surfaces, and not perfect copies.

Bra ögonmått ;). Nä men som jag säger så litar jag inte 100% på det skjutmåttet... Jag har inte kört någon budget-scanner via mobil ännu. Tycker det verkar otroligt osmidigt och bara problem med Apple telefon. För många skanners behöver du absolut ett nvidia-kort och en PC, det är svårt att komma runt så fort du ska behandla datan. Då har jag åtminstone inte sett något som inte kräver PC. Moose lite är billig och superbra sätt att komma in i 3D-skanning. Den kommer vara svår på större och vissa ytor med lite detaljer på, men då får man vara kreativ och hitta sätt att låta skannern tracka. Noggrannheten gör den ändå OK för mycket hemma-pill för den som skal bygga och meka och behöver information in i ett CAD system. För skruvhål så hade jag skruvat i skruvar/3D-print jiggar för att få saker som sticker ut (och därmed enklare att tracka/mäta i efterhand). Men ja, den är så pass billig att jag köpt en om jag inte redan haft andra skanners :). Den är däremot inte fantastisk på att ge dig en ren, färdig-städad mesh. Men för mått, referensytor och det du beskriver så gör det egentligen ingenting. Jag tror många kommer önska sig något "större" med tiden, för att ta in större modeller. Men då kommer de troligtvis också behöva betala mer, eller bara få lägre upplösning på delarna, då är det fint att "ha kvar" sin Moose/Moose lite för de små projekten.

@@3DPrintTechDesign tack för ditt svar. Om jag inte läser fel så ska Moose fungera på mac också så det är ju bra. Det är inte så att du har en enklare modell som du kan dela. Hade varit intressant att få upp den i fusion och se hur det ser ut.

Thank you Marc! Hope you enjoy it and find 3D scanning helpful and interesting :) Remember it can be a bit frustrating in the beginning until you get the hold of tracking objects :D Good luck!

How’s it working out?

Not if your items are low detail. This scanner has a narrower field of view and is focused on smaller items. Have a look at this one instead: geni.us/lynx3D. But with low detail objects you might have to prepare them anyways to track, it depends a bit. Send me an email from my website if you need more specific tips for your parts

Sorry, those files are long gone :/

Thanks! And sorry to your wallet 🤪. The enclosure definitely helps with dust. And I suggest you run a dust filter if you use external spool!

I understand. But I see it as a win win. In the case where I’ve made a difference, showing you the real value and features of a product, with good and bad, and you still wish to buy it, it’s a win win. It’s almost harder for you the viewer to click an affiliate link than it is to google the product anyway :). By being upfront and honest about the links and that they allow me to buy products to review, So you’re not only seeing what companies send out, we achieve better coverage. I hope to earn your trust, but I understand you might think my positives are biased when I use affiliate links. My mission is to be honest no matter what and I take inspiration from the big tech RUclipsrs who, for good or bad, all use affiliate and sponsorships

@@3DPrintTechDesign either I miss the part in your video where you mentioned the affiliation / sponsorship of this product in your video or it wasn't in the video. If it was in the video it would help with providing transparency if you included at the beginning of your video. Don't think this isn't the wrong way as you did bring up some constructive criticism on the device It issues it has. But your reality is probably all software related since most of these scanners to needs very similar hardware but in the end it's the software that will make them for break them

You’re right, the software is critical and that’s why I’m quite harsh on this scanner and trying my best to put in the expectations. You see it on the Mole scanner review as well, where the hardware and software both operate worse than the moose. The review unit is a loaner, so it’s not a sponsored video in any ways. I will probably end up giving it away as they rarely want to return it to china due to shipping costs, even tho it’s in my terms. And I do call out that I have affiliate links to the product in the description. Thank you for the feedback, I’ll try to see what I can do to be even more transparent in the end :)

I wish I had tried the Einstar myself! But I haven’t had the opportunity to do that yet. I have good connections that recommend it very well, but I don’t think they’ve tried budget scanners like revopoint and 3Dmakerpro to compare it either. The software for Einstar is probably better, but how the scan/track differs is probably not much of the field-of-view and etc. is similar. If I recall, the einstar is a bit more medium-format

@@3DPrintTechDesign I have one but the Moose looks to be much faster. My Einscan get "lost" very easily and hates most dark colors. It is also very slow even though I got the company to buy me a $4500 laptop to support it. I might just have to put in a requisition for the Moose pro and upload a comparison of my own LOL. I just want to make sure that I am using my "buy me this gizmo tokens" for work for a worthy cause.

Haha, yeah the dark scanning is actually mighty impressive on the moose lite. But with the other type of light on the “PRO” moose, you might have a different result. The tracking is probably not remarkable better. It could just be user experience and object, really. Scanning speed is probably better then if you feel so. I’m using a good Pc, but usb 3 port on the front, so no crazy usb speeds either.